Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Study Finds Underwater Borrowers Drowned Themselves with Refinancings

Why are so many homeowners underwater on their mortgages?

In crafting programs to prevent foreclosures, policymakers have assumed that the primary reason homeowners owe more on their home than it is worth is that they bought at the top of the market. In other words, they’ve lost equity primarily through forces beyond their control.
A
new study challenges this premise and finds that excessive borrowing may have played as great a role.

Michael LaCour-Little, a finance professor at California State University at Fullerton, looked at 4,000 foreclosures in Southern California from 2006-08. He found that, at least in Southern California, borrowers who defaulted on their mortgages didn’t purchase their homes at the top of the market. Instead, the average acquisition was made in 2002 and many homes lost to foreclosure were bought in the 1990s. More than half of all borrowers who lost their homes had already refinanced at least once, and four out of five had a second mortgage.

The original loan-to-value ratio for these borrowers stood at a reasonable 84%, but second and third liens left homeowners with a combined loan-to-value ratio of about 150% by the time of the foreclosure sale date.

Borrowers, meanwhile, took out around $2 billion in equity from their homes, or nearly eight times the $262 million that they put into their homes. Lenders lost around four times as much as borrowers, seeing $1 billion in losses.

To read the original article click here

Other articles of interest...
SEC says 900 defrauded in mortgage scam
Four promoters and a Phoenix-based company have been accused of defrauding at least 900 investors
Banks Dirty Secret Of Profitable Foreclosures
Despite the governments efforts to provide loan modifications for individuals and families...
Who's counting anymore these days?
No, prices didn't rise, says BW. In fact, they went down. Just not by a lot:
Banks still need bigger cushions
Yes, leverage is down, but only relative to the obscene levels reached a year ago.

No comments: